Interview Q&A / Git & GitHub
Git & GitHub interview questions
Branching, merge vs rebase, resolving conflicts and pull requests, the way teams actually work.
Prefer rapid revision? Practise Git & GitHub short interview answers →
- How do you resolve a merge conflict in Git?
Run git status to see the conflicted files, open each one and find the markers <<<<<<<, ======= and >>>>>>>. Edit the code to the correct final version, delete the markers, then git add the file and run git commit (or git rebase --continue during a rebase). Test before you push.
BeginnerIn-depth3 min read - Can you resolve a merge conflict on GitHub without using the command line?
Yes for simple text conflicts. The pull request page has a Resolve conflicts button that opens an editor with markers; fix them, mark resolved and commit. Complex cases like deleted or binary files need a local merge.
BeginnerQuick answer1 min read - How can a team reduce merge conflicts?
Keep branches short-lived, pull or rebase from main often, make small focused pull requests, avoid reformatting whole files, and talk when two people touch the same area.
BeginnerQuick answer1 min read - How do you cancel a merge that went wrong?
Run git merge --abort. It restores your branch and working tree to the state before the merge started. It works while the merge is still unresolved and uncommitted.
BeginnerQuick answer1 min read - What do the <<<<<<<, ======= and >>>>>>> markers in a file mean?
They are Git's conflict markers. The part between <<<<<<< and ======= is your current branch's version, and the part between ======= and >>>>>>> is the incoming version. You edit the file to the final text and delete all three marker lines.
BeginnerQuick answer1 min read